Saturday, December 19, 2015

Islamic Jurisprudence (sharia law)


Sources of Islamic law:

Accepted universally by all Muslims
Not accepted universally by all Muslims
Text
Intellect

1.    Reason (personal effort of thinking) 

2.    Public good or public interest

3.    Preference

4.    Common practice

5.    Textual indication

The Quran
Tradition of the Prophet
Consensus or unanimous agreement

Analogical deduction.




Degrees of approval:


Obligatory (obligation - compulsory – must)
Recommended (desirable)
Neutral (lawful - allowed –permissible)
Abominable (disliked – hated)
Sinful (unlawful – prohibition - forbidden)

Fard (Wajib)
Mustahab
Halal
Makrouh
Haram

Individual duty
Sufficiency duty





relates to tasks every Muslim is required to perform.
is a duty which is imposed on the whole community of believers
Example
Daily prayer or the pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime.
Janaza prayer
Umrah 
Eating an apple. 
The use of a great amount of water for the small and large ablutions.
Pre-marital sex, murder, eating pork, and drinking alcohol.
Fulfillment
is rewarded
is rewarded
is not rewarded
is not punished
is punished
neglected
with punishment
without punishment
without punishment
with reward
with reward


 The schools of Jurisprudence:

1.        Imam Malik
2.        Imam Ash-Shafi’i
3.        Imam Abu hanifah
4.        Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal.


The four orthodox Sunni Islamic schools of jurisprudence (fiqh)

The Hanbali school
The Shafi'i
The Mālikī
The Hanafi
       The founder
       Ahmad ibn Hanbal
       (780–855 CE / 164–241 AH)
       Al-Shafi'i (767 — 820 CE / 150 — 204 AH)
       Malik bin Anas (711–795 CE / 93–179 AH)
       Abū Ḥanīfa an-Nu‘man
       (699 – 767 AD / 80 – 148 AH)
       History
       He was a disciple of Al-Shafi‘i. Like Shafi'i, he was deeply concerned with the extreme elasticity being deployed by many jurists of his time, who used their discretion to reinterpret the doctrines of Quran and Hadiths to suit the demands of Caliphs and wealthy. Ibn Hanbal advocated return to literal interpretation of Quran and Hadiths. Influenced by the debates of his time, he was known for rejecting religious rulings (Ijtihad) from the consensus of jurists of his time, which he considered to be speculative theology (Kalam). He associated them with the Mu'tazilis, who he despised. Ibn Hanbal was also hostile to the discretionary principles of rulings in jurisprudence (Usul al-fiqh), which were established by his predecessors; Al-Shaf'i, Imam Malik and Abu Hanifa. He linked these discretionary principles with kalam. His guiding principle was that the Quran and Sunnah are the only proper sources of Islamic jurisprudence, and are of equal authority and should be interpreted literally in line with the Athari creed. He also believed that there can be no true consensus (Ijma) among jurists (mujtahids) of his time, and preferred the consensus of Muhammad's companions and weaker hadiths. Imam Hanbal himself compiled Al-Musnad, a text with over 30,000 saying, actions and customs of Muhammad.
       The Shafi'i madhab was spread by Al-Shafi'i students in Cairo, Mecca and Baghdad. It became widely accepted in early history of Islam.
       The Shafi'i jurisprudence was adopted as the official law during the Great Seljuq Empire, Zengid dynasty, Ayyubid dynasty and later the Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo), where it saw its widest application. It was also adopted by the Kathiri state in Hadhramawt and most of rule of the Sharif of Mecca.
       With the establishment and expansion of Ottoman Empire in West Asia and Turkic Sultanates in Central and South Asia, Shafi'i school was replaced with Hanafi school, in part because Hanafites allowed Istihsan (juristic preference) that allowed the rulers flexibility in interpreting the religious law to their administrative preferences.
       Although Ibn Anas himself was a native of Medina, his school faced fierce competition for followers in the Muslim east, with the Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools all enjoying more success than Malik's school. It was eventually the Hanafi school, however, that earned official government favor from the Abbasids.
       The Malikis enjoyed considerably more success in the Africa, and for a while in Spain and Sicily. Under the Umayyads and their remnants, the Maliki school was promoted as the official state code of law, and Maliki judges had free rein over religious practices; in return, the Malikis were expected to support and legitimize the government's right to power. This dominance in Spanish Andalus from the Umayyads up to the Almoravids continued, with Islamic law in the region dominated by the opinions of Malik and his students. The Sunnah and Hadith, or prophetic tradition in Islam, played lesser roles as Maliki jurists viewed both with suspicion, and few were well versed in either.
       As the fourth Caliph, Ali had transferred the Islamic capital to Kufa, and many of the first generation of Muslims had settled there, the Hanafi school of law based many of its rulings on the earliest Islamic traditions as transmitted by first generation Muslims residing in Iraq. Ali and Abdullah, son of Masud formed much of the base of the school. In the early history of Islam, Hanafi doctrine was not fully compiled. The fiqh was fully compiled and documented in the 11th century. The Turkish rulers were some of the earliest adopters of relatively more flexible Hanafi fiqh, and preferred it over the traditionalist Medina-based fiqhs which favored correlating all laws to Quran and Hadiths and disfavored Islamic law based on discretion of jurists. The Abbasids patronized the Hanafi school from the 10th century onwards. The Seljuk Turkish dynasties of 11th and 12th centuries, followed by Ottomans adopted Hanafi fiqh.
       Sources of law
      The sources of Islamic law are
1.      the Qur'an
2.      and the Sunnah found in Hadiths (compilation of sayings, actions and customs of Muhammad).
3.      Where these texts did not provide guidance, the Hanbali school recommended guidance from established consensus of Muhammad's companions,
4.      then individual opinion of Muhammad's companions,
5.      followed in order of preference by weaker hadiths,
6.      and in rare cases qiyas (analogy).
       This school rejected that a source of Islamic law can be jurists personal discretionary opinion or consensus of later generation Muslims on matters that serve the interest of Islam and community.
       Ibn Hanbal's strict standards of acceptance regarding the sources of Islamic law were probably due to his suspicion regarding the field of Usul al-Fiqh, which he equated with speculative theology (kalam).
       The school stipulates authority to five sources of jurisprudence. In hierarchical order:
       1- the Quran,
       2- the hadiths - that is, sayings, customs and practices of Muhammad,
       3- the ijmā' (consensus of Sahabah, the community of Muhammad's companions),
      4- the individual opinions of Sahaba with preference to one closest to the issue as Ijtihad,
       5- and finally qiyas (analogy).
       The Shafi'i school rejects two sources of Sharia that are accepted in other major schools of Islam:
       - Istihsan (juristic preference, promoting the interest of Islam)
       - and Istislah (public interest).

       The Shafi'i school rejected these two principles stating that these methods rely on subjective human opinions, its potential for corruption and adjustment to political context and time.
       Maliki school's sources for Sharia are hierarchically prioritized as follows:
1.   Quran
2.   and then trustworthy Hadiths (sayings, customs and actions of Muhammad);
3.   if these sources were ambiguous on an issue, then `Amal (customs and practices of the people of Medina),
4.   followed by consensus of the Sahabah (the companions of Muhammad),
5.   then individual's opinion from the Sahabah,
6.   Qiyas (analogy),
7.   Istislah (interest and welfare of Islam and Muslims),
8.   - and finally Urf (custom of people throughout the Muslim world if it did not contradict the hierarchically higher sources of Sharia).
       Mālik included the practices of the people of Medina and where the practices are in compliance with or in variance with the hadiths reported. This is because Mālik regarded the practices of Medina (the first three generations) to be a superior proof of the "living" sunnah than isolated, although sound, hadiths.
       The sources from which the Hanafi madhhab derives Islamic law are, in order of importance and preference:
1- the Quran,
2- and the hadiths containing the words, actions and customs of the Islamic prophet Muhammad (narrated in six hadith collections, of which Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim are the most relied upon);
3- if these sources were ambiguous on an issue, then the consensus of the Sahabah community (Ijma of the companions of Muhammad),
4- then individual's opinion from the Sahabah,
5- Qiyas (analogy),
6- Istihsan (juristic preference),
7- and finally local Urf (local custom of people).










No comments:

Post a Comment